JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP  
     title   icon icon icon  
  icon icon icon  
HOME  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 31, Issue 4 

CURRENT ISSUE

BACK ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

ADVERTISE

ABOUT JCEHP

FOR AUTHORS

JCEHP AWARD

SEARCH

(Members only) FULL-TEXT
 
Volume 31 (4)

Volume 31, Issue 4, Fall 2011line
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2011; 31(4):225-230
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Professional development is enhanced by serving as a mini-CEX preceptor
Walter Chen, Ming-May Lai, Tsai-Chung Li, Paul J. Chen, Cho-Yu Chan, Cheng-Chieh Lin

A b s t r a c t

Introduction:
The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) is widely used for the evaluation of medical trainees' clinical competence. To our knowledge, no study has examined the effect of mini-CEX on the preceptors. Based on the principle of "to teach is to learn twice," we hypothesized that the act of precepting a mini-CEX would enhance preceptors' own learning and performance.
Methods:
A 21-item questionnaire incorporating the 3 out of 4 levels of Kirkpatrick's model was completed by experienced mini-CEX preceptors. Data collected from the questionnaire included ratings of Kirkpatrick's level of "Reaction" (level 1) and "Behavior" (level 3) and the frequencies of relearning the clinical skills related to mini-CEX, which assessed Kirkpatrick's "Learning" (level 2).
Results:
A majority of the respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that precepting the mini-CEX both increased reflection on their own clinical practice and had a positive impact on their clinical skills. More than 80% of preceptors reported relearning one or more of the mini-CEX clinical skills. Experienced preceptors relearned the clinical skills more frequently than the less experienced preceptors. About one-third of respondents indicated that being a preceptor of mini-CEX increased both self-confidence and health care quality in their own clinical practice.
Discussion:
These findings provide preliminary evidence suggesting that participating as a preceptor in a mini-CEX has a positive impact on the preceptor's professional development. Further studies are needed, including analyzing mechanisms of mini-CEX on the clinical skills of preceptor, and assessing whether similar effects can be observed in other teaching hospitals in different cultural contexts.

Lessons For Practice
  • Using a survey based on Kirkpatrick’s levels of Reaction, Learning, and Behavior, this study provides evidence that serving as a preceptor for a mini-CEX stimulates reflection, and enhances one’s own active learning and professional development.
  • Experienced preceptors, as identified by clinical seniority, age, or previous mini-CEX experience, were likely to report that they had relearned the clinical skills related to mini-CEX more frequently than less experienced preceptors.
  • Replication of this study in teaching hospitals in other cultural contexts and indepth analyses of the various mechanisms for sustainable and continuous professional development in clinical practice are suggested for further research.

line


Copyright © 1996-2012
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
All rights reserved
Disclaimer ·  About This Site ·  Web Editor  · Make JCEHP Your Homepage

Information on this site was last updated: 31 January 2012