JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP  
     title   icon icon icon  
  icon icon icon  
HOME  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 30, Issue 1 

CURRENT ISSUE

BACK ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

ADVERTISE

ABOUT JCEHP

FOR AUTHORS

JCEHP AWARD

SEARCH
 
Volume 30 (1)

Volume 30, Issue 1, Winter 2010line
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2010; 30(1):44-50
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Do continuing medical education articles foster shared decision making?
Michel Labrecque, Valérie Lafortune, Judith Lajeunesse, Anne-Marie Lambert-Perrault, Hermes Manrique, Johanne Blais, France Légaré

A b s t r a c t

Introduction: Defined as reviews of clinical aspects of a specific health problem published in peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, offered without charge, continuing medical education (CME) articles form a key strategy for translating knowledge into practice. This study assessed CME articles for mention of evidencebased information on benefits and harms of available treatment and/or preventive options that are deemed essential for shared decision making (SDM) to occur in clinical practice. Methods: Articles were selected from 5 medical journals that publish CME articles and are provided free of charge to primary-care physicians of the province of Quebec, Canada. Two individuals independently scored each article with the use of a 10-item checklist based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. In case of discrepancy, the item score was established by team consensus. Scores were added to produce a total article score ranging from 0 (no item present) to 10 (all items present). Results: Thirty articles (6 articles per journal) were selected. Total article scores ranged from 1 to 9, with a mean (± SD) of 3.1 ± 2.0 (95% confidence interval 2.8-4.3). Health conditions and treatment options were the items most frequently discussed in the articles; next came treatment benefits. Possible harms, the use of the same denominators for benefits and harms, and methods to facilitate the communication of benefits and harms to patients were almost never described. No significant differences between journals were observed. Discussion: The CME articles evaluated did not include the evidence-based information necessary to foster SDM in clinical practice. Peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals should require CME articles to include this type of information.

Lessons for Practice
  • Continuing medical education (CME) articles on clinical management of health problems published in medical journals distributed in Quebec, Canada, lack information on benefits and harms of treatment and preventive options found to be essential for shared decision making (SDM) to occur in clinical practice.
  • CME articles should better align with the principles of evidence-based medicine and the principles of SDM.
  • Medical journals should require the authors of CME articles to follow clear guidelines, for example, applying a CONSORT-adapted statement for review and publishing of articles describing the possible benefits and harms associated with all relevant treatment and preventive options in such a way that it is translated to patients easily and effectively.

line


Copyright © 1996-2010
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
All rights reserved
Disclaimer ·  About This Site ·  Web Editor  · Make JCEHP Your Homepage

Information on this site was last updated: 18 June 2010