CURRENT ISSUE
BACK ISSUES
SUBSCRIBE
ADVERTISE
ABOUT JCEHP
FOR AUTHORS
JCEHP AWARD
SEARCH
|
|
Volume 30 (1)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Winter 2010
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2010; 30(1):44-50
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Do continuing medical education articles foster shared decision making?
Michel Labrecque, Valérie Lafortune, Judith Lajeunesse, Anne-Marie Lambert-Perrault, Hermes Manrique, Johanne Blais, France Légaré
A b s t r a c t
Introduction: Defined as reviews of clinical aspects of a specific health problem published in peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, offered without charge, continuing medical education (CME) articles form a
key strategy for translating knowledge into practice. This study assessed CME articles for mention of evidencebased
information on benefits and harms of available treatment and/or preventive options that are deemed
essential for shared decision making (SDM) to occur in clinical practice.
Methods: Articles were selected from 5 medical journals that publish CME articles and are provided free of charge
to primary-care physicians of the province of Quebec, Canada. Two individuals independently scored each article
with the use of a 10-item checklist based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. In case of discrepancy,
the item score was established by team consensus. Scores were added to produce a total article score
ranging from 0 (no item present) to 10 (all items present).
Results: Thirty articles (6 articles per journal) were selected. Total article scores ranged from 1 to 9, with a mean
(± SD) of 3.1 ± 2.0 (95% confidence interval 2.8-4.3). Health conditions and treatment options were the items
most frequently discussed in the articles; next came treatment benefits. Possible harms, the use of the same
denominators for benefits and harms, and methods to facilitate the communication of benefits and harms to
patients were almost never described. No significant differences between journals were observed.
Discussion: The CME articles evaluated did not include the evidence-based information necessary to foster SDM
in clinical practice. Peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals should require CME articles to include
this type of information.
Lessons for Practice
- Continuing medical education (CME) articles
on clinical management of health
problems published in medical journals distributed
in Quebec, Canada, lack information
on benefits and harms of treatment
and preventive options found to be essential
for shared decision making (SDM) to
occur in clinical practice.
- CME articles should better align with the
principles of evidence-based medicine and
the principles of SDM.
- Medical journals should require the authors
of CME articles to follow clear guidelines,
for example, applying a CONSORT-adapted
statement for review and publishing of articles
describing the possible benefits and
harms associated with all relevant treatment
and preventive options in such a way
that it is translated to patients easily and
effectively.
|