Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions



HOME \| SITE MAP \| CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 30, Issue 1

CURRENT ISSUE BACK ISSUES SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ABOUT JCEHP FOR AUTHORS JCEHP AWARD SEARCH (Members only) FULL-TEXT		Volume 30 (1) Volume 30, Issue 1, Winter 2010 J Contin Educ Health Prof 2010; 30(1):26-36 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Assessment and remediation for physicians with suspected performance problems: An international survey Charlotte Humphrey A b s t r a c t Introduction: Little is known about the overall appropriateness and value of the various programs available internationally for assessment and remediation for individual physicians whose performance in their clinical practice has been identified as giving cause for concern. Method: A questionnaire was e-mailed to members of the International Physicians Assessment Coalition and/or the Coalition for Physician Enhancement—organizations that were thought to provide this type of assessment (n = 20). Questions covered the aims, organization, methods, and outcomes of assessment programs and associated remediation. Results: Responses came from 15 regulatory bodies, universities, not-for-profits, and health service organizations in 5 countries. The assessment programs and remediation activities identified were small in scale. Their focus ranged from a narrow concern with identifying and repairing specific knowledge and skills deficits to a wider interest in the biopsychosocial functioning of the physician as a whole. Both “diagnosis” and “treatment” of problems focused on the individual physician. Less attention was given to broader systems or contextual factors that might impact performance. Although progress through remediation was carefully monitored, none of the programs undertook regular systematic follow-up to ascertain the success of their interventions in the longer term. Discussion: This field of activity is characterized by the use of sophisticated methods for measuring performance/ competence, but provision of remediation is more patchy and variable. The small scale of these programs raises questions about the relationship between scale of provision and potential need for remediation. Gaps in information about impact and outcomes mean that the overall impact and value of this type of assessment and remediation is hard to determine. Lessons for Practice Programs for assessment and remediation of physicians with identified performance or competence problems relating to their clinical practice are available in several countries. These programs are characteristically small in scale and little is known about the scope and appropriateness of their coverage in relation to potential unmet need. Assessment and remediation programs focus on the individual physician and pay little attention to broader systems or contextual factors that may impact on performance. The value and effectiveness of assessment and remediation programs in dealing with performance problems remains uncertain, in the absence of robust means of monitoring their impact on the physicians involved.
HOME \| SITE MAP \| CONTACT US Copyright © 1996-2012 JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions All rights reserved Disclaimer · About This Site · Web Editor · Make JCEHP Your Homepage Information on this site was last updated: 31 January 2012