|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||
| Your Location: Home > Volume 30, Issue 1 | |||||
|
CURRENT ISSUE
BACK ISSUES SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ABOUT JCEHP FOR AUTHORS JCEHP AWARD SEARCH (Members only) FULL-TEXT |
Volume 30 (1)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Winter 2010 
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2010; 30(1):51-56
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Anna R. Gagliardi, Frances C. Wright A b s t r a c t Introduction: There are few opportunities for mentorship of practicing surgeons and no evidence to guide the design of such programs. This study explored outcomes and barriers associated with the design of surgical mentorship programs. Methods: Interviews were held with organizers, mentors, and protégés of 2 programs. Data from 23 participant interviews and 23 nonparticipant surveys were analyzed thematically. Results: Participation was greater in the program where planning was participatory and mentors visited protégés. Scheduling was a key barrier, and existing relationships enabled mentorship. Most nonparticipants said they were already trained or had no interest in the skill. Mentorship was valued for exchange of tacit knowledge, hands-on learning, and real-time feedback. Mentorship prompted participants to realize gaps in skill; several said they already adopted the new skill, and many were interested in ongoing mentorship. Discussion: Several beneficial outcomes appear to be associated with mentorship, but longitudinal evaluation is required. Telementoring and train-the-trainer models may promote participation in surgical mentorship. Participants suggested that technical training be integrated within pre- and postmentorship education and follow-up. Such programs can only be implemented if issues of sponsorship and funding are addressed. Lessons for Practice
|
|
|
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions All rights reserved Disclaimer · About This Site · Web Editor · Make JCEHP Your Homepage Information on this site was last updated: 31 January 2012 |
||