JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP  
     title   icon icon icon  
  icon icon icon  
HOME  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 28, Issue 4 

CURRENT ISSUE

BACK ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

ADVERTISE

ABOUT JCEHP

FOR AUTHORS

JCEHP AWARD

SEARCH
 
Volume 28 (4)

Volume 28, Issue 4, Fall 2008line
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008; 28(4):197
ORIGIANL RESEARCH

Using County-Level Public Health Data to Prioritize Medical Education Topics
Walton Sumner II, Mario Schootman, Philip Asaro, Yan Yan, Michael D. Hagen

A b s t r a c t

Introduction: Medical education topics might be locally prioritized using public health data on health outcomes and risk factors unrelated to quality of care.
Methods: The Missouri Information for Community Assessment (MICA) supplied preventable hospitalization rates (PHRs) for asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, heart failure, and hypertension in 114 counties from 1998 to 2002. For each disease, a linear regression model predicted PHR from behavior, access, and disease prevalence data from MICA and other public data sources. For each disease in each county, the residual, unexplained PHR should include effects of local medical practices. Variation in relative priority of diseases between counties was estimated from raw PHR and unexplained PHR.
Results: The raw values of the five PHRs varied geographically in different patterns. Regression models explained between 46% and 83&337; of the variability. The medical education priorities implied by unexplained PHR values differ from priorities inferred from unadjusted PHR or disease prevalence.
Discussion: Patient behavior and poor health care access contribute to PHR but do not fully explain variation in PHR. If county-level unexplained PHR values identify high priority medical education topics, then other measures of importance, notably disease prevalence and PHR, are poor identifiers of high value topics. Although available predictor and outcome variables constrain the current analysis, unexplained variation in health outcome measures might identify educational opportunities. These observations suggest strategies for balancing and evaluating controlled trials of knowledge dissemination efforts and eventually for deploying educational activities.
Key Words: knowledge translation, certification, health care quality indicators, continuing medical education, assessment, community, needs, preventable hospitalization rates

Lessons for Practice
  • Neither disease prevalence nor preventable hospitalization rates identify topics for which medical education interventions might quickly improve public health, because behavior and health care access account for many hospitalizations and regional variation.
  • Unexplained variation in preventable hospitalization rates should correlate with quality of care and might be reduced by regionally targeted educational interventions.
  • A robust public health informatics infrastructure is required to predict medical education needs and assess the effect of educational interventions.

line


Copyright © 1996-2010
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
All rights reserved
Disclaimer ·  About This Site ·  Web Editor  · Make JCEHP Your Homepage

Information on this site was last updated: 18 June 2010