JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP  
     title   icon icon icon  
  icon icon icon  
HOME  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 23, Issue 2 

CURRENT ISSUE

BACK ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

ADVERTISE

ABOUT JCEHP

FOR AUTHORS

JCEHP AWARD

SEARCH

(Members only) FULL-TEXT
 
Volume 23 (Suppl)

Volume 23, Supplement 1 line
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003; 23(suppl):S10-S18
ISSUES INVOLVING PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND IMPROVEMENT

Place matters in physician practice and learning
Cervero RM

A b s t r a c t

Since the early 1960s, most discussions about the improvement of continuing medical education (CME) have begun by seeking a better understanding of how physicians learn. The goal of this movement has been to put physician learners and their learning needs, not new research findings, at the center of the educational process. This has led CME away from the update model of education and into many innovative and exciting educational developments. However, as the conditions of medical practice have been changing in the past 20 years, the possibilities and conceptions of CME have also changed. Many in medicine and CME now recognize that the real world of physician decision making takes place in a highly charged political-economic context, where the interaction between the patient and physician is perhaps the least complex element. From this fundamental starting point, an emerging discourse has begun in CME that addresses physicians' changing work environments, the accountability schemes and financial incentives built into medical practice, and the importance of physicians' community of peers in making practice changes. We need to build on these observations to change the focus from "how physicians learn" to "where physicians learn." From this new perspective, physician practice and learning are seen as fundamentally social acts, and our attention is drawn to all of the ways in which "place matters." Attention to where physicians practice and learn can be used to improve CME.

Lessons for Practice
  • To improve physicians' clinical judgments, educational interventions should allow physicians to reflect on real-time interactions with patients in the presence of people from their geographically or professionally defined systems of practice.
  • To improve the systems in which physicians practice, educational interventions should provide ways for physicians and other members of the office staff and health care team providing care to reflect on ways that organizational processes enable and constrain effective medical practice.
  • Policy makers responsible for licensing, certification, and accreditation need to develop systems that move from accumulating credits to rewarding effective individual and system learning.
MeSH Terms: Education, Medical, Continuing; Models, Educational; Problem-Based Learning

Publication Type: Review
line


Copyright © 1996-2012
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
All rights reserved
Disclaimer ·  About This Site ·  Web Editor  · Make JCEHP Your Homepage

Information on this site was last updated: 04 April 2012