JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP  
     title   icon icon icon  
  icon icon icon  
HOME  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 23, Issue 2 

CURRENT ISSUE

BACK ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

ADVERTISE

ABOUT JCEHP

FOR AUTHORS

JCEHP AWARD

SEARCH

(Members only) FULL-TEXT
 
Volume 23 (2)

Volume 23, Issue 2, Spring 2003 line
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003; 23(2):109-115
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals
Miller RG
Ashar BH
Getz KJ

A b s t r a c t

INTRODUCTION: Continuing medical education (CME) for physicians and other health personnel is becoming increasingly important in light of recertification requirements. Interactive learning is more effective and may be useful in a continuing education setting. This study examines the use of an audience response system (ARS) as an interactive learning tool for health care providers.
METHOD: We conducted a national randomized controlled trial to evaluate the utility of an ARS to enhance attention and learning. Speakers at 42 clinical round table (CRT) programs in five regions across the United States were randomized to "use" or "no use" of an ARS during their lectures. We surveyed participants to collect data regarding presentation and speaker quality, impressions of the ARS, and knowledge of the material presented. We collected information from speakers regarding ease of use and overall opinions of the ARS.
RESULTS: A total of 283 surveys were completed (164 from participants using the ARS and 119 from participants not using the ARS). ARS participants rated the quality of the presentation, the quality of the speaker, and their level of attention more highly than non-ARS participants (p < .05). Knowledge scores (of material presented) were not significantly different between the two groups. Both participants and speakers felt that the ARS was easy to use and preferred to use the system in future CRTs.
DISCUSSION: Participants in CRTs with the ARS rated presentation and speaker quality more favorably than those participants in CRTs without the tool. Participant knowledge scores, however, were not significantly different. ARSs may provide easy-to-use tools to enhance attention and enthusiasm in CME learners.

Lessons for Practice
  • The audience response system provides an easy-to-use tool that is favorably perceived by participants and speakers in continuing education programs.
  • The positive impact of an audience response system on short-term information retention and knowledge has not been proven.
  • Decisions regarding use of an audience response system must weigh educational benefits and popularity with equipment and personnel costs.
MeSH Terms: Attitude of Health Personnel; Certification; Consumer Participation; Data Collection; Education, Medical, Continuing; Feedback; Program Evaluation; Programmed Instruction

Publication Type: Randomized Controlled Trial; Clinical Trial
line


Copyright © 1996-2012
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
All rights reserved
Disclaimer ·  About This Site ·  Web Editor  · Make JCEHP Your Homepage

Information on this site was last updated: 31 January 2012