JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP  
     title   icon icon icon  
  icon icon icon  
HOME  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 22, Issue 4 

CURRENT ISSUE

BACK ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

ADVERTISE

ABOUT JCEHP

FOR AUTHORS

JCEHP AWARD

SEARCH

(Members only) FULL-TEXT
 
Volume 22 (4)

Volume 22, Issue 4, Fall 2002 line
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002; 22(4):197-204
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS

Use of theory to interpret elements of change
Slotnick HB
Shershneva MB

A b s t r a c t

Actions useful in reducing unacceptable variation in physicians' clinical activities have been identified through critical reviews of randomized controlled trials, and, from them, Richard Grol proposed six elements of effective change for mounting programs to improve clinical practice. The elements include consideration of the complex reality of clinical practice, attention to the designated change, analysis of the target group and setting, mixed interventions to address needs, and a plan of action. Although empirically based, the elements lack a theoretical underpinning that explains why the elements work. This article interprets the elements using theories separately advanced by Dewey, Slotnick, and Wenger to suggest ways for understanding what studies have shown.

Lessons for Practice
  • A theoretical basis should be available to explain educational actions that are taken.
  • Learning theory offers the promise of providing insights into physician behavior, both individually and in communities of practice.
MeSH Terms: Attitude of Health Personnel; Behavior; Diffusion of Innovation; Education, Medical, Continuing; Evidence-Based Medicine; Learning; Models, Educational; Physician's Practice Patterns; Problem-Based Learning
line


Copyright © 1996-2012
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
All rights reserved
Disclaimer ·  About This Site ·  Web Editor  · Make JCEHP Your Homepage

Information on this site was last updated: 31 January 2012