Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions



HOME \| SITE MAP \| CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 22, Issue 1

CURRENT ISSUE BACK ISSUES SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ABOUT JCEHP FOR AUTHORS JCEHP AWARD SEARCH (Members only) FULL-TEXT		Volume 22 (1) Volume 22, Issue 1, Winter 2002 J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002; 22(1):43-54 ORIGINAL ARTICLES Academia-industry collaboration in continuing medical education: description of two approaches Katz HP Goldfinger SE Fletcher SW A b s t r a c t INTRODUCTION: Although concerns have been raised about industry support of continuing medical education (CME), there are few published reports of academia-industry collaboration in the field. We describe and evaluate Pri-Med, a CME experience for primary care clinicians developed jointly by the Harvard Medical School (HMS) and M/C Communications. METHODS: Since 1995, 19 Pri-Med conferences have been held in four cities, drawing more than 100,000 primary care clinicians. The educational core of each Pri-Med conference is a 3-day Harvard course, "Current Clinical Issues in Primary Care." Course content is determined by a faculty committee independent of any commercial influence. Revenues from multiple industry sources flow through M/C Communications to the medical school as an educational grant to support primary care education. Pri-Med also offers separate pharmaceutical company-funded symposia. RESULTS: Comparing the two educational approaches during four conferences, 221 HMS talks and 103 symposia were presented. The HMS course covered a wide range with 133 topics; the symposia focused on 30 topics, most of which were linked to recently approved new therapeutic products manufactured by the funders. Both the course and the symposia were highly rated by attendees. DISCUSSION: When CME presentations for primary care physicians receive direct support from industry, the range of offered topics is narrower than when programs are developed independently of such support. There appear to be no differences in the perceived quality of presentations delivered with and without such support. Our experience suggests that a firewall between program planners and providers of financial support will result in a broader array of educational subjects relevant to the field of primary care. Lessons for Practice Physicians should be aware of whether CME activities are funded by single or multiple sponsors in industry-funded conferences. Since industry-funded CME focuses almost exclusively on drug therapy, a more balanced CME experience is achieved by attending activities that are not solely sponsored by industry, especially single-company-funded courses. Clinicians should evaluate whether presentations are balanced, fair, and free of commercial influence and provide direct feedback to conference sponsors and faculty if there are any concerns. MeSH Terms: Congresses; Consumer Satisfaction; Cooperative Behavior; Drug Industry; Education, Medical, Continuing; Faculty, Medical; Family Practice; Interinstitutional Relations; Primary Health Care; Program Evaluation; Schools, Medical; Training Support Publication Type: Evaluation Studies
HOME \| SITE MAP \| CONTACT US Copyright © 1996-2012 JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions All rights reserved Disclaimer · About This Site · Web Editor · Make JCEHP Your Homepage Information on this site was last updated: 04 April 2012