CURRENT ISSUE
BACK ISSUES
SUBSCRIBE
ADVERTISE
ABOUT JCEHP
FOR AUTHORS
JCEHP AWARD
SEARCH
(Members only) FULL-TEXT
|
|
Volume 19 (4)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Fall 1999
J Contin Educ Health Prof 1999; 19(4):242-249
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Continuing Medical Education on the Internet: State of the Art
Michael W. Peterson, MD, FACP
A b s t r a c t
The Internet is a powerful communication tool. It offers new and novel ways to provide
continuing medical education (CME) to health care professionals. However, it is not yet
clear whether universities and university medical schools are using this new technology. Also,
few standards exist for controlling and measuring content quality on the Internet. To address
these issues, 205 different Internet host computers offering CME information were identified
using standard Internet search engines. These sites were then reviewed by examining their
sponsoring organization, type of information, and quality with respect to proposed standards
for quality control. University-sponsored Internet sites most frequently provided CME information,
followed by commercial sites. However, most university-sponsored sites offered only
schedule information for traditional CME courses: twice the percentage of commercial sites
offered on-line CME compared to university sites. Thus, more commercial sites than university
sites offer on-line CME content. Between 60% and 80% of sites offering on-line CME
meet proposed standards for quality control, and only 10% provide any information on content
peer review. University sites performed somewhat better than commercial sites in meeting
these standards. As of 1998, universities may be losing their traditional leadership in CME
using the new Internet medium. Many sites offering on-line CME also do not meet minimal
standards for quality control. Universities need to reassert their traditional strengths by providing
CME in this new medium, and quality standards need to be applied to all CME material
on the Internet.
Keywords: Continuing Medical Education; Internet; Website Quality Evaluation
|