|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|||
| Your Location: Home > Volume 19, Issue 4 | |||||
|
CURRENT ISSUE
BACK ISSUES SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ABOUT JCEHP FOR AUTHORS JCEHP AWARD SEARCH (Members only) FULL-TEXT |
Volume 19 (4)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Fall 1999 
J Contin Educ Health Prof 1999; 19(4):214-221
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Janet Grant, BA, MSc, PhD, FBPsS, FRCGP A b s t r a c t Outcome measures for continuing education are important for the profession, health service managers, statutory bodies, the government, the public, and education providers. However, outcome measurement offers challenges of methodology. Finding measures that are appropriate to expert clinical practice demands a new approach based both on existing methods and on professional judgments. Outcome measurement also poses questions about cause and effect, because the extent to which any measured outcome can be attributed to specific educational interventions is limited by factors that intervene between an identified educational need, the subsequent education, and changes based on that education. Keywords: Continuing Medical Education; Continuing Professional Development; Outcome Measures |
|
|
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions All rights reserved Disclaimer · About This Site · Web Editor · Make JCEHP Your Homepage Information on this site was last updated: 04 April 2012 |
||