JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP JCEHP  
     title   icon icon icon  
  icon icon icon  
HOME  |  SITE MAP  |  CONTACT US
Your Location: Home > Volume 17, Issue 3 

CURRENT ISSUE

BACK ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

ADVERTISE

ABOUT JCEHP

FOR AUTHORS

JCEHP AWARD

SEARCH
 
Volume 17 (3)

Volume 17, Issue 3, Summer 1997
J Contin Educ Health Prof 1997; 17(3):141-147
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Workshop versus Lecture in CME: Does Physician Learning Method Preference Make a Difference?
Yves Lacoursière, CME "Intern"
Linda Snell, MD, FRCPC
Jacqueline McClaran, BSc, MD, FCFP(C)
Eliane Duarte-Franco, MD, MPH

A b s t r a c t

Is learning enhanced when the continuing medical education (CME) intervention corresponds to the physician’s preferred learning method? Eighty-eight primary care community- based physicians were involved in this study. Each physician attended one of three 2-day CME programs based on a needs assessment of community-based primary care physicians. Each program consisted of both plenary lectures and workshops. Learning method preference and demographic profile were captured by an individual electronic touch pad that allowed each physician’s responses to be uniquely identified by the system. A pre- and post-test for each workshop and each lecture was carried out. Responses were noted via touch pad. Mean test score improvement occurred for each intervention and was statistically significant for 12 of 14 interventions. Mean test score improvements for workshops and for lectures were not different. Mean test score improvements were not affected by physician learning method preference. These results are not explained by gender, year of graduation, or rural/urban differences of physicians. Contrary to our hypothesis, our data suggest that physicians do not necessarily learn more when the type of CME intervention is concordant with their preferred learning methods. Further, workshops, small groups, and other interactive CME activities may not always be more effective than didactic methods such as lectures. Further study is warranted. In the meantime, it may be more efficient for CME teachers and providers to use methods with which they are comfortable or that they consider more appropriate to the content.

Keywords: Continuing Medical Education; Didactic versus Interactive; Electronic Touch Pad; Intervention Study; Knowledge Outcome; Lecture versus Workshop; Multiple Choice Questionnaire; Physician Learning Method Preference; Post-Test; Pretest
line


Copyright © 1996-2008
JCEHP.com & The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
All rights reserved
Disclaimer ·  About This Site ·  Web Editor  · Make JCEHP Your Homepage

Information on this site was last updated: 28 October 2008