CURRENT ISSUE
BACK ISSUES
SUBSCRIBE
ADVERTISE
ABOUT JCEHP
FOR AUTHORS
JCEHP AWARD
SEARCH
|
|
Volume 16 (4)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Fall 1996
J Contin Educ Health Prof 1996; 16(3):241-249
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Keeping Professionally Updated: Perceived Coping and CME Profiles among Physicians
Magne Nylenna, MD
Olaf G. Aasland, MD
Erik Falkum, MD
A b s t r a c t
The aim of this study was to investigate physicians’ coping with the increasing body
of medical knowledge and the relation between this coping and their continuing medical education
(CME) activities. A cross-sectional postal survey among a randomized sample of 1476
Norwegian physicians was conducted. The main outcome measure was a self-reported ability
to obtain sufficient information to keep updated in their daily work. The relative risks of being
a coper are given as odds ratios (ORs) for the categories of seven hypothetical predictor variables.
The response rate was 70.5%, with 68.5% of the physicians reporting that they are able
to obtain the sufficient information for keeping updated. In a multiple logistic regression analysis,
being a male (OR: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25–2.45), attending conferences
or meetings more than 15 days per year (OR: 2.69, CI: 1.62–4.48), and reading medical literature
more than 2 hours per week (OR: 1.97, CI: 1.33–2.91) were significant predictors of such
coping. Physicians who managed to cope with the medical information had a lower level of
emotional distress (OR: 2.00, CI: 1.21–3.30) and a higher level of job satisfaction (OR: 1.55,
CI: 1.14–2.12) than noncopers. Physicians who give CME activities a high priority are more
likely to regard themselves sufficiently updated than others. The ability to cope with the increasing
flow of medical information is clearly related to doctors’ well-being and job satisfaction.
Keywords: Continuing medical education; coping, information; job satisfaction; reading
|